Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10  
Depósito Legal ZU2019000058 - ISSN 2711-0494  
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 - Número 10  
Enero – Junio 2024  
Maracaibo – Venezuela  
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation for the  
Unemployed Youths  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.38186/difcie.610.05  
Pinky Flavia Thulisile Ndashe *  
Carol Levender **  
Ademola Olumuyiwa Omotosho ***  
ABSTRACT  
The widespread impact of the Coronavirus pandemic has led to substantial job losses,  
prompting increased pressure on policymakers, scholars, and non-governmental  
organizations to generate sustainable employment opportunities for young individuals,  
particularly within economically disadvantaged communities. This investigation focuses on  
the feasibility of integrating unemployed youth into established commercial broiler value  
chains as a means to address the employment gap resulting from the pandemic. Its  
objective is to raise awareness among governments, institutions, and stakeholders  
regarding the hurdles faced by young people aspiring to engage in chicken production. To  
assess the current status of small-scale poultry farming in the studied region, interviews  
were conducted with small-scale poultry producers in Umhlathuze Municipality, KwaZulu-  
Natal, South Africa, along with experts from Owen Sithole College of Agriculture. Insights  
gathered from participants indicate various obstacles to poultry production in the area, such  
as insufficient digital, limited space, skill-shortage, restricted market access, low profitability,  
and instances of theft. Consequently, a proposed solution, the 'Collective Farming Model,'  
is advocated. Moreover, the authors contend that the efficacy of this model hinges  
significantly on its apprenticeship-based learning system, validated through successful  
implementation in a prototype initiative.  
KEYWORDS: Cooperative, Poultry farming, Smallholders, Entrepreneurship, South Africa,  
Collective farming model.  
*
9
University of Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8703-  
588.  
*University of Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1372-  
741.  
*
9
*
Recibido: 20/10/2023  
Aceptado: 07/12/2023  
6
3
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
Reposicionamiento de la agricultura cooperativa de aves de  
corral como vocación para los jóvenes desempleados  
RESUMEN  
El impacto generalizado de la pandemia del Coronavirus ha llevado a una pérdida de  
empleo sustancial, lo que provocó una mayor presión sobre los encargados de  
formular políticas, los académicos y las organizaciones no gubernamentales para  
generar oportunidades de empleo sostenibles para las personas jóvenes,  
particularmente dentro de las comunidades económicamente desfavorecidas. Esta  
investigación se centra en la viabilidad de integrar a los jóvenes desempleados en las  
cadenas de valor de pollos de engorde comerciales establecidas como un medio para  
abordar la brecha laboral resultante de la pandemia. Su objetivo es crear conciencia  
entre los gobiernos, las instituciones y las partes interesadas con respecto a los  
obstáculos que enfrentan los jóvenes que aspiran a participar en la producción de  
pollos. Para evaluar el estado actual de la agricultura avícola a pequeña escala en la  
región estudiada, se realizaron entrevistas con productores avícolas a pequeña escala  
en el municipio de Umhlathuze, Kwazulu-Natal, Sudáfrica, junto con expertos del Owen  
Sithole College of Agriculture. Las ideas reunidas de los participantes indican varios  
obstáculos a la producción avícola en el área, como insuficiente espacio digital,  
espacio limitado, cambio de habilidad, acceso restringido al mercado, baja rentabilidad  
e instancias de robo. En consecuencia, se defiende una solución propuesta, el "modelo  
de agricultura colectiva". Además, los autores sostienen que la eficacia de este modelo  
depende significativamente de su sistema de aprendizaje, validado a través de la  
implementación exitosa de una iniciativa prototipo.  
PALABRAS CLAVE: Cooperativa, Agricultura avícola, Pequeños productores,  
Emprendimiento, Sudáfrica, Modelo de agricultura colectiva.  
Introduction  
The poultry industry offers a sustainable source of food supply to households  
around the world (Nkukwana, 2018). In other words, poultry farming facilitates the job  
creation (Smirnov, 2019), and maximizes agricultural production (Gržinić et al., 2023).  
In recent years, the global outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic has led to substantial  
job losses in various nations, including South Africa (Omotosho et al, 2023). Research  
indicates that the national lockdown during the first quarter of 2020 resulted in  
approximately 2.2 million job losses in South Africa (Cascale & Posel, 2020). Despite  
the significant role of the chicken industry, particularly as one of South Africa's key  
agricultural sectors with nearly 100,000 workers, smaller poultry producers continue to  
6
4
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
encounter hurdles accessing markets (Hobbs, et al., 2018). In light of this phenomenon,  
the authors argue that cooperative farming may offer poultry farmers a viable option for  
collaborating and addressing the above-mentioned challenge collectively.  
The concept of cooperative poultry farming has been instrumental in tackling the  
issue of limited market access, particularly in less affluent countries (Hellin, et al., 2009).  
For instance, in 2017, over 75% of the milk produced in the United States was sold  
through dairy cooperatives (Wadsworth et al., 2021). Furthermore, disparities in  
cooperative market shares are notable across industries and countries (Bunse, et al.,  
2
011). While Italian cooperatives held a mere 5% market share in the olive oil industry  
in 2010, Spanish cooperatives dominated with 70% (Stasi et al., 2018). Similarly, in the  
pig meat market, French and Danish cooperatives secured 86% and 94% shares,  
respectively, whereas other European Union nations lagged behind (Bijman et al.,  
2
012). The foregoing suggests that cooperative farming model is a community  
development approach that allows individuals with shared interests to work together for  
mutual benefit.  
The attractiveness of cooperatives stems from their access to global markets and  
their focus on export-oriented, high-quality products, encouraging farmers to join  
(Morakile, 2018). Through cost-cutting measures and leveraging market dominance,  
cooperatives have the potential to boost community development and membership  
remains voluntary and self-sustaining, fostering mutually beneficial partnerships with  
the community and government (Candemir et al., 2021). Poultry farming not only  
enhances food security but also supports sustainable agriculture in impoverished  
nations, with over 80% of rural households utilizing it as a renewable resource and raw  
material for the confectionery industry (Nkukwana, 2018). To meet the demand for  
animal protein, governments and non-governmental organisations has initiated various  
programs, including the Future Farmers Foundation, World Poultry Foundation, and  
Supreme Poultry among others (Alders et al., 2009). These initiatives aim to empower  
farmers in developing nations and foster global poultry production and consumption.  
Notably, training provided by international and national organisations and experts has  
greatly benefited small-scale chicken farmers in South Africa (Wiskirchen et al., 2022).  
Moreover, these programmes primarily educate farmers on modern, efficient livestock  
rearing methods, which subsequently increase farmers' income (Aladejebi et al., 2014).  
Despite the establishment of these initiatives, the poultry industry in Umhlathuze  
6
5
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
Municipality falls short of achieving self-sufficiency in poultry production, and the level  
of involvement of the youths in this sector remain unsatisfactory (Mhlongo, 2017).  
In light of the above, the study poses the following inquiries:  
RQ1. How satisfied are youths who operate as poultry farmers?  
RQ2. What challenges do youths face in their endeavour to operate as poultry  
farmers?  
RQ3. What strategies are necessary to engage youths in sustainable poultry  
farming?  
1. Theoretical Foundation  
The theoretical framework for this study lies in the theory of cooperative learning.  
This theory suggests that participants, believing their group's ability to cooperate  
influences their success, are inclined to encourage actions that benefit the group's  
success (Swortzel, 1997). Furthermore, they tend to provide mutual support in  
completing tasks (Yager et al., 1986). Consequently, cooperative efforts enhance the  
likelihood of participants' success. Within groups of resource-limited poultry producers,  
collaborative endeavours facilitate clearer articulation of thoughts and ideas through  
discussions and debates (Kirui's, 2019). This heightened level of discourse surpasses  
that found in instructor-led sessions, thereby fostering progress in the farmers'  
enterprises. According to the constructivist perspective, such cooperative engagement  
encourages critical thinking among members as they develop their own solutions  
(Davis, Mahler, & Noddings, 1990). The resulting implication is that cooperation among  
poultry farmers stands as the optimal approach. This collaborative effort will generate  
tangible economic benefits essential for ensuring sustained food production.  
2. Selection and Description of the Study Area  
Umhlathuze Municipality, positioned on the northeast coast of KwaZulu-Natal,  
spans an area of 94,361 km², contributing 7.7% to South Africa’s total expanse. Notably,  
the KZN Province boasts substantial agricultural productivity, hosting the highest  
number of farming households in the country (Nino et al, 2020). The primary towns of  
Richards Bay and Empangeni, along with various chieftain areas within the Zulu  
Kingdom under the Ingonyama Trust Landfall, are encompassed within the municipal  
boundaries.  
6
6
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
Covering 1195 km², Umhlathuze sustains a population of 384,449 (Official Gazette,  
021). The decline in formal employment within agriculture is evident in the region,  
2
where the sector's significance in job creation has dwindled. Agriculture here is more of  
a cultural pursuit, illustrating rural residents engaging in limited cattle rearing or  
subsistence farming for household needs. However, this often falls short in ensuring  
household food security or generating economic activity. Conversely, the education  
sector emerges as the primary job provider, exhibiting a consistent upward trend.  
Considering the pivotal role of agriculture in national development, the declining  
significance of these sectors raises concerns. KwaZulu-Natal comprises five local  
municipalities, namely: uMhlathuze, Nkandla, uMfolozi, Mthonjaneni, and uMlalazi.  
Refer to Figure 1 for a map depicting Umhlathuze Municipality.  
Figure 1. Map of Umhlathuze Municipality  
3. Methodology  
Multi-stage and purposive sampling methods were employed to select a location  
whose units of observation meet specific criteria. The process involved a multi-stage  
sampling technique that deliberately chose Sokhulu, Mabuyeni, Ongoye, Port Durnford,  
Eshawini, Matshana, and Mzingazi due to their agricultural potential. In contrast, the  
uMhlathuze Local Municipality, despite having the lowest economic contribution from its  
agricultural sector at 3.2%, faces challenges where small-scale poultry farmers struggle  
to sustain themselves and engage in food value chains. This struggle results in their  
exclusion from capital markets, posing significant hurdles for their economic survival  
(Nino et al, 2020).  
6
7
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
3.1. Research Design  
This study employs a qualitative research approach to comprehensively depict the  
operational landscape of small-scale poultry farms in the designated area. Data were  
acquired through structured interviews conducted with the explicit consent of  
participants, some of which were audio-recorded with the permission of the academic  
staff involved. These interviews, including focus group sessions, explored diverse  
facets such as the state of technological learning environments within the institution,  
the accessibility and reliability of internet services for both staff and students, the  
impact of these technological spaces on teaching and learning well-being, challenges  
related to available technological resources, and recommendations for enhancement.  
3.2. Sampling  
The sampling methodology aligns with Kumar's (2018) suggestion of utilizing the  
formula K = N ÷ n, where K represents the interval width, N the total population, and n  
the sample size. Ten percent of the total population of small poultry farmers was  
sampled due to the limited presence of such farmers in the Umhlathuze Municipal area,  
South Africa. Data collection focused on eight (8) small poultry farmers within this  
region, employing a systematic approach. All participants possess substantial  
experience in poultry farming and possess comprehensive knowledge regarding the  
status of poultry farms within the municipal area.  
3.3. Data Analysis  
Extensive volumes of transcribed data underwent meticulous scrutiny to identify  
recurrent patterns and discrepancies. The identification of these patterns in participant  
responses facilitated the development of overarching themes and sub-themes crucial to  
addressing the study's core research inquiries. Theme analysis served as the  
framework for presenting empirical data and formulating conclusions.  
3.4. Ethical Considerations and Trustworthiness  
Ethics in research, as elucidated by Resnik et al. (2015), encompass the strategies,  
procedures, and foundational principles governing ethical conduct and addressing  
complex research-related issues. Participants received assurances of strict  
confidentiality regarding the collected data, ensuring its exclusive utilization for  
6
8
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
academic purposes. Furthermore, to safeguard participants' anonymity and privacy, no  
requests for personal information such as names or addresses were made during  
interviews. The study's findings were presented in a manner that precluded any  
identification of the participants. Importantly, ethical clearance was secured from the  
institution housing the participants before data collection. Ensuring validity and  
dependability were central to establishing credibility in this qualitative research, thereby  
necessitating ongoing analysis and interpretation of data until accurately reflecting  
participant perspectives.  
4. Results and discussion  
The findings were presented based on three primary facets delineated as themes:  
the age demographics of participants, their educational attainment, and the degree of  
contentment in their poultry farming endeavours, along with the challenges impeding  
youths from engaging in poultry farming and the requisite strategies for their  
involvement.  
4.1. Participants’ Age  
The findings unveiled that the majority of participants fell within the middle-aged  
bracket, with an average age of 41.25%. Notably, youth representation among  
participants was markedly scant. These outcomes align with the observations made by  
Vusi & Oladele (2013) in their study conducted in the Capricorn District of Limpopo  
Province, South Africa, which highlighted the paucity of youth involvement in poultry  
projects. Additionally, Ekunwe et al. (2014) reported that 58% of individuals aged 20-49  
and 33.3% aged 50-59 were engaged in poultry businesses. Collectively, these findings  
underscore that poultry-based enterprises predominantly attract middle-aged and  
elderly women. Hence, strategies in extension programs should be tailored considering  
the demographic realities of target cohorts. Furthermore, there is a need to explore why  
younger individuals are not participating in these income-generating activities,  
particularly amidst prevalent youth unemployment in the Umhlathuze region. Insights  
gleaned from these studies can inform the development of more pertinent extension  
strategies to effectively mobilize and involve young individuals sustainably.  
4.2. Level of Education  
6
9
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
The study ascertained that all participants possessed a minimum of a matric  
certificate, indicating their potential to comprehend the intricacies of poultry  
management given appropriate training. This corroborates Kirui's (2019) assertion that  
poultry projects perform better when members boast higher educational levels.  
Emaikwu et al. (2011) further established that education significantly influences the  
inclination to adopt innovations that enhance profitability, and higher educational  
attainment is associated with more adept management and production in poultry  
projects. Therefore, the provision of continual education and training should be an  
integral component of agricultural extension efforts for poultry-based enterprises.  
4.3. Farmers’ level of satisfaction with poultry farming  
When participants were asked to comment on their satisfaction levels with the  
current state of their poultry farms, a variety of responses were received. Nearly all  
participants expressed dissatisfaction with their farm situations, as reflected in the  
verbatim remarks provided:  
Participant 1: No  
Participant 2: No  
Participant 3: Not satisfied due to lack of capital, inadequate infrastructure, and limited  
resources such as water access.  
Participant 4: No  
Participant 5: Not at all  
Participant 6: No  
Participant 7: Not yet  
Participant 8: Yes  
This finding suggests that farmers were facing challenges in carrying out their daily  
farming activities. Virtually all participants affirmed their discontent with the status quo,  
indicating a need for urgent intervention from stakeholders to address the situation.  
According to Moloto et al. (2016), SMEs in the poultry industry struggle to survive,  
contributing to a high failure rate among poultry farmers. Leong (2017) also notes that  
small poultry farmers face numerous constraints in daily operations, making the  
business a challenging endeavour. The challenges faced by youth aspiring to become  
poultry farmers were further highlighted:  
7
0
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
Participant 1: Limited space; capital and infrastructure are too expensive.  
Participant 2: Problem of theft; wishes to expand poultry house.  
Participant 3: I am still learning, made mistakes, and has a shortage of equipment.  
Participant 4: No access to market.  
Participant 5: No enough support from the Department of Agriculture.  
Participant 6: Difficulty in accessing assistance from extension officers and private  
sector agents.  
Participant 7: Small chicken coop limits production.  
Participant 8: Lack of proper structure for the chickens.  
Major challenges identified by participants included limited space, poor access to  
markets, and the inability to expand poultry structures. Mtelga et al. (2016) also  
observed similar challenges faced by South African small poultry farmers. The study  
emphasizes the need for public extension services to intervene by providing mentoring,  
skills-based training, and funding to enhance the success of small poultry farmers. To  
encourage youth engagement in sustainable poultry farming, participants suggested  
measures such as coaching, funding, mentorship, and the creation of a marketplace.  
However, the challenges of strict regulatory procedures and the need for organizational  
support were acknowledged.  
Additionally, the prospects of collective marketing of broilers were explored, with  
agriculture experts providing insights as follows:  
-
Agriculture Expert 1: experiential education is highly essential, marketing within the  
organization, and collaboration with poultry-related entities.  
Agriculture Expert 2: it is imperative to have cooperative efforts among small-scale  
poultry farmers.  
Agriculture Expert 3: the importance of marketing in poultry farming cannot be  
-
-
overstated, therefore collective marketing is recommended to enhance sustainability  
through digital platforms.  
-Agriculture Expert 4: there is a need for subsidized purchasing of inputs and the  
attachment of agricultural graduates to small-scale poultry farms.  
-Agriculture Expert 5:collective marketing helps to share cost of production.  
-Agriculture Expert 6: I am not optimistic about the impact of collective farming on the  
current situation.  
7
1
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
The use of low-cost digital devices to improve poultry welfare was also discussed by  
agriculture experts:  
-
Agriculture Expert 1:Digital devices are needed for business growth and reducing  
costs.  
Agriculture Expert 2: Digital platforms is relevant for advertising and improving product  
quality during harvesting.  
Agriculture Expert 3: Experimentation with low-cost digital devices is required to  
enhance production, prevent food insecurity, and improve product quality.  
Agriculture Expert 4: It is useful to have low-cost digital devices with continuous  
monitoring and support.  
Agriculture Expert 5: There is a necessity for small poultry farmers to familiarize  
themselves with digital tools.  
Agriculture Expert 6: There is potential for higher profitability through the adoption of  
-
-
-
-
-
low-cost digital tools.  
Overall, the findings suggest a widespread awareness among participants and  
agriculture experts regarding the importance of digital tools in enhancing poultry welfare  
and ensuring sustainability. This aligns with the perspective of Gal et al. (2019),  
emphasizing the benefits of digitalization for small firms in improving productivity and  
competitiveness.  
5. The Proposed Collective Farming Model and Discussion  
Figure: 2: The Proposed Collective Farming Model / Source: Authors own creation  
7
2
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
The model underscores the interconnectedness between the Department of  
Agriculture and Rural Development and small poultry farmers, as delineated in  
Figure 2. The model posits that isolated farming is not viable; instead, uniformity in  
product quality across all farms is imperative. All training sessions will be  
mandatory and practical, while aid will be offered through direct procurement rather  
than cash disbursements. Additionally, the promotion of innovation among small  
poultry farmers involves recommending the adoption of simple digital tools within  
poultry facilities. An Intelligent System necessitates smartphones for real-time  
monitoring, controlling environmental factors like temperature, humidity, and  
disease occurrences. The envisioned benefits of this recommendation encompass  
reduced production costs, access to new technologies, heightened efficiency, and  
a wealth of knowledge and resources.  
Stakeholders’ role in implementing this model include:  
-Owen Sithole College of Agriculture: This institution, where the study was  
conducted, operates on an apprenticeship learning system and is well-positioned  
to take a leading role in implementing the proposed model.  
-Department of Agriculture and Rural Development: This department will  
initiate the project, conduct necessary research, oversee project progress, identify  
participants, aid in marketing, and offer grants for mentors.  
-King Cetshwayo Municipal District: Responsible for providing land for essential  
infrastructures and assisting in regulatory matters concerning erecting broiler  
processing plants and environmental assessments.  
-
Small-scale farmers: Required to upgrade their broiler houses to meet quality  
standards for raising marketable chickens.  
Department of Economic Development (LED): To finance the procurement of  
-
necessary infrastructure such as storehouses, silos, and offices.  
Conclusion and Recommendations  
The outcome of this study indicates that poultry production in Umhlathuze  
Municipality region is primarily managed by middle-aged and elderly individuals. In  
other words, Despite the large number of unemployed young people in the region,  
youth involvement is almost nonexistent. In this regard, the identified barriers include  
7
3
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
insufficient knowledge, skills shortage, space constraints, limited market access, low  
profitability, and theft. Despite these challenges, it is established that the sector holds  
promise for progress. Revamping the local extension service is crucial to addressing  
these challenges, necessitating platforms for cooperative learning among farmers.  
Additionally, supporting small poultry holders with inputs, vaccines, infrastructure, and  
government regulations to counter unfair import competition is imperative.  
Collaborations with academic institutions can offer innovative solutions, contributing  
significantly to food security and economic growth. Achieving these objectives requires  
cohesive efforts from all involved parties.  
References  
Aladejebi, O.J., Okojie, L.O. and Afolami, C.A., (2014). Comparative production  
efficiency of battery cage and deep litter system in the drive towards sustainable poultry  
egg farming in Ogun state, Nigeria. J. Sust. Dev. Afr, 16(4), pp.139-159. https://jsd-  
africa.com/Jsda/Vol16No4Sum14B/PDF/ComparativeProductionEfficiency.OluAladejebi.  
pdf  
Alders, R.G., Pym, R.A.E. and Rushton, J., (2009). Report on the Family Poultry  
Workshop held during the XXIII World's Poultry Congress. World's Poultry Science  
Journal, 65(2), pp.298-305.  
Bijman, J., Muradian, R. and Cechin, A., (2012). Agricultural cooperatives and value  
chain coordination: Jos Bijman, Roldan Muradian and Andrei Cechin. In Value Chains,  
Social 98-117).  
/agricultural-cooperatives-value-chain-coordination-jos-bijman-roldan-muradian-  
6
andrei-cechin  
Biyase, M. and Zwane, T., (2018). An empirical analysis of the determinants of poverty  
and household welfare in South Africa. The Journal of Developing Areas, 52(1),  
pp.115-130.  
Bunse, K., Vodicka, M., Schönsleben, P., Brülhart, M. and Ernst, F.O., (2011).  
Integrating energy efficiency performance in production management–gap analysis  
between industrial needs and scientific literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19 (6-  
7
), pp.667-679.  
Candemir, A., Duvaleix, S. and Latruffe, L.,(2021). Agricultural cooperatives and farm  
Casale, D. and Posel, D., (2020). Gender and the early effects of the COVID-19 crisis  
el,  
18.  
3
/publication/343008071_Gender_and_the_early_effects_of_the_COVID-  
7
4
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
1
eff1845ae/Gender-and-the-early-effects-of-the-COVID-19-crisis-in-the-paid-and-  
unpaid-economies-in-South-Africa.pdf  
Davis, R.B., Mahler, C.A. and Noddings, N., (1990). Constructivist views on the  
teaching and learning of mathematics. National Council of Teachers of  
Mathematics. Reston, VA, pp.107-124. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED328422  
Drozdzewski, D., (2014). ‘They have no concept of what a farm is’: Exploring rural  
change through tree change migration. Rural change in Australia: Population, economy,  
danielle-drozdzewski  
Ekunwe, P.A., Fiona, O. and Ogbeide, R., (2014). Socio-economic Factors Influencing  
Broilers Marketing in Bernin City Metropolis, Edo State, Nigeria. Jurnal Internasional,  
Departemen of Agriculture Economics and Extension Services, Faculty of Agriculture  
Emaikwu, K.K., Chikwendu, D.O. and Sani, A.S., (2011). Determinants of flock size in  
broiler production in Kaduna State of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension and  
Rural pp.202-  
2
Gal, P., Nicoletti, G., von Rüden, C., Oecd, S.S. and Renault, T., (2019). Digitalization  
and productivity: In search of the holy grail-firm-level empirical evidence from European  
Productivity  
Monitor,  
(37),  
pp.39-71.  
Gržinić, G., Piotrowicz-Cieślak, A., Klimkowicz-Pawlas, A., Górny, R.L., Ławniczek-  
Wałczyk, A., Piechowicz, L., Olkowska, E., Potrykus, M., Tankiewicz, M., Krupka, M.  
and Siebielec, G., (2023). Intensive poultry farming: A review of the impact on the  
environment and human health. Science of The Total Environment, 858, p.160014.  
Hobbs, J., Draper, P. and Beswick, C., (2018). Poultry tariffs in South Africa: Levelling  
the playing field or rewarding inefficiency?. Africa’s Competitiveness in the Global  
Economy, pp.351-386.  
Kirui, O., (2019). The Agricultural mechanization in Africa: micro-level analysis of state  
Kumar, R., (2018). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage.  
from:  
Kumar+(2018)+&ots=cvpnGyKJfi&sig=ZMo697jJWzTarHc5rTPR-UIzxzA  
Moloto, M.L. and Seeletse, S.M., (2016). Some leading causes of emerging rural  
poultry small and medium enterprises failure in South Africa. Environmental economics,  
(7,  
Iss.  
3),  
pp.  
25-32.  
7
5
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/envirecon_2016_7_3_5.pdf  
Morakile, G., (2018). Survey on preferred supplier base mechanism for smallholder  
farmers/cooperatives to derive better access to government market.  
Mtega, W.P., Ngoepe, M. and Dube, L., (2016). Factors influencing access to  
agricultural knowledge: The case of smallholder rice farmers in the Kilombero district of  
Nino, E.C., Lane, S., Okano, K., Rahman, I., Peng, B., Benn, H., Fatti, C.C., Maree, G.,  
Khanyile, S. and Washbourne, C., (2020). Urban agriculture in the Gauteng City-  
Region’s green infrastructure network (Vol. 15). Gauteng City Region Observatory  
Nino,+E.C.,+Lane,+S.,+Okano,+K.,+Rahman,+I.,+Peng,+B.,+Benn,+H.,+Fatti,+C.C.,+  
=
Maree,+G.,+Khanyile,+S.+and+Washbourne,+C.,+2020.+Urban+agriculture+in+the+G  
auteng+City-  
Region%E2%80%99s+green+infrastructure+network+(Vol.+15).+Gauteng+City+Regio  
n+Observatory+(GCRO).&ots=3a7akM2wPg&sig=3qzHXY0uyl7I5XCMcQBIIu6QAfQ  
Nkukwana, T.T., (2018). Global poultry production: Current impact and future outlook  
on the South African poultry industry. South African Journal of Animal Science, 48(5),  
pp.869-884.  
Ogunyade, T.O. and Oyibo, W.A., (2003). Use of CD-ROM MEDLINE by medical  
students of the College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Medical  
Internet Research, 5(1), p.e876. https://www.jmir.org/2003/1/e7/4/5/2004  
Resnik, D.B., Elliott, K.C. and Miller, A.K., (2015). A framework for addressing ethical  
Sadiq, S., Singh, I.P. and Ahmad, M.M., (2021). Cost Efficiency Status of Rice Farmers  
Participating in IFAD/VCD Programme in Niger State of Nigeria. Yüzüncü Yıl  
31(2),  
pp.268-276.  
Smirnov, A.A., (2019), August. The prospect of the development of the poultry industry.  
In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 315, No. 2, p.  
0
22100). IOP Publishing.  
Swortzel, K.A., (1997). How Ohio teachers use AgVenture magazine to increase  
agricultural literacy among their students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 38, pp.29-  
d790cb8a3bd4bfdba0bfb61  
Vusi, N. and Oladele, O.I., (2013). Analysis of constraints faced by small scale broiler  
famers in Capricorn district in Limpopo province. Life Science Journal, 10(1).  
7
6
Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica  
Volumen 6 – Número 10 – Enero/Junio 2024 - ISSN 2711-0494  
P. F. Thulisile Ndashe et al// Repositioning Cooperative Poultry Farming as a Vocation...63-77  
2
4-104605-1u5sz3v.pdf  
Wadsworth, J., Rivera, J. and Lapp, K., (2021). Agricultural Cooperative Statistics  
019 (No. 2162-2021-2863). (Accessed on 22 September, 2021) from:  
Watts, C. and Ibegbulam, I., (2006). Access to electronic healthcare information  
resources in developing countries: Experiences from the Medical Library, College of  
32(1),  
pp.54-61.  
Wiskirchen, K.H., Jacobsen, T.C., Ditchkoff, S.S., Demarais, S., Gitzen, R.A. and  
Soulsbury, C., (2022). Behaviour of a large ungulate reflects temporal patterns of  
predation risk. Wildlife Research. https://www.publish.csiro.au/wr/WR21047  
Yager, S., Johnson, R.T., Johnson, D.W. and Snider, B., (1986). The impact of group  
processing on achievement in cooperative learning groups. The Journal of Social  
pp.389-397.  
Conflicto de interés  
Los autores de este manuscrito declaran no tener ningún conflicto de interés.  
Copyright  
La Revista Latinoamericana de Difusión Científica declara que reconoce los derechos  
de los autores de los trabajos originales que en ella se publican; dichos trabajos son  
propiedad intelectual de sus autores. Los autores preservan sus derechos de autoría y  
comparten sin propósitos comerciales, según la licencia adoptada por la revista.  
Licencia Creative Commons  
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-  
Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional  
7
7